With so many alternatives available, it is often asked which method of marketing is most effective. Because of escalating costs, many businesses and organizations have opted for predominantly electronic marketing (internet), but those using exclusively electronic market often complain that they are not getting the response they anticipated. While some corporations are successful using predominantly internet marketing, the most successful "Web" campaigns are those that use other media to direct the target audience online. Some of those media include television, radio, print media (newspapers and magazines), advertising (including banners) on other Web sites, and direct mail marketing.
Although internet marketing is quite effective in attracting certain target markets, the exclusive use of internet marketing often excludes a number of potential "targets." Certain products directed toward certain generations of individuals can be marketed primarily by electronic marketing (however, there is still the need to direct the target market to the site that one wants to market), but other products, and many services need more attention to "conventional" marketing.
Many organizations have dramatically reduced printing and mailing as their primary method of "outreach," predominantly because of the escalating costs of printing and postage. Some then substitute an almost exclusive electronic "outreach" method, and many are then disappointed to find, for example, that attendance at events and conferences, as well as membership dues and donations collections end up suffering, as a result. While the elaborate multi-colored, expensive paper, expensive to mail magazines and brochures produced years ago usually are difficult to justify, less expensive printing and mailing should often be considered.
However, any mailing should effectively "sell the sizzle", so that even a casual glance by a viewer would "catch the eye" and interest the recipient. Statistics indicate that conventional mailing in envelopes can be quite ineffective, because it is time consuming to produce and distribute, can be costly, and does not get enough "views." The reality with "envelope" mailing is that a large number of recipients never even open the envelope, considering it to be "junk," and never bothering to view the contents and message. On the other hand, postcards can be quite effective, because the message cannot be easily avoided by the viewer, and they are relatively inexpensive to produce and distribute.
An organization has two choices in terms of the type of postcard to send, regular-size or over-sized. While some argue that over-sized get more "views," studies have indicated that both sizes, if produced correctly, receive approximately the same response. The huge advantage of regular sized postcards is that they are significantly less expensive to mail.
The most effective postcards are those that are printed on both sides, with a "sell the sizzle," catchy phrase on the address side, and the words "See Other Side" printed cleverly. On the other side, a very brief, to the point message, emphasizing the main message, and providing a phone number, an e-mail contact address, and a website to go to for details. Depending on the type of mailing, typical response rates on organizational postcard mailings range from about one to eight percent. In addition, an effective ;postcard campaign can be produced for approximately $350 per thousand pieces (even less if not-for-profit bulk rates are taken advantage of), including printing and postage.
Organizations that really want to optimize their results should use creative postcard marketing, in conjunction with internet promotions. Postcards are both cost effective and productive, and will improve results of any organization's marketing!
No comments:
Post a Comment